The electronic ' vulnerable ' machine is once again in controversy but now the issue is not another allegation of its malfunction rather a legal controversy as the Supreme Court (SC) has sent notices to the EC seeking the withdrawal of penal provisions in Conduct of Election rules, 1961 ( the rules which threaten voters complaining of EVM malfunction or deviant behavior with a jail term, if the allegations is not borne out). Currently the Rule 49MA ( section 177 of IPC) , deals with supplying of false information and the responsibility of proof lies with the complainant. Clearly, the threat of punishment cripples the freedom of speech and avoids the petitioner to question the credibility of the system known to protect the election enthusiasm. For example; in assam, in ongoing elections, a former DC of assam police, refrained from challenging the credibility of the machine where he had cast his vote, even though the VVPAT showed a different outcome from his input. He ...